Repost: NYTimes, “Weight-Loss Drugs Could Save U.S. Airlines $580 Million/Year”
NOT A DAMN THING
Since the rise of semaglutide in US, NPR runs a story about it being a miralce drug about once a month. People eating less has positives for everyone, except, maybe, snack makers and people who like ‘em thicc.
For some reason, I decided to repost my 5th least favorite paper, The New York Times, covering one aspect of this. Article is behind a paywall. NYTimes has caused so much damage I don’t care if you give them a click, but for consistency’s sake: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/19/travel/airlines-weight-loss-drugs.html
Airlines have a long history of looking for ways to reduce the weight of their aircraft. (Credit: Carter Johnston for The New York Times)
Weight-Loss Drugs Could Save U.S. Airlines $580 Million Per Year
A study by the financial firm Jefferies highlights a surprising perk for carriers: lower fuel costs as slimmer passengers lighten their aircraft’s loads.
Gabe Castro-Root; Jan. 19, 2026
Weight-loss drugs like Ozempic have transformed millions of lives with easily administered treatments and quick results.
Now it turns out the dropped pounds may have a surprising perk for airlines, too: lower fuel costs, as slimmer passengers lighten their aircraft’s loads.
According to a study published last week by Jefferies, a financial services firm, the four largest U.S. carriers — American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines — could together save as much as $580 million per year on fuel thanks to weight-loss drugs, known as GLP-1s.
Sheila Kahyaoglu, an equity analyst at Jefferies and an author of the study, said the findings didn’t surprise her because airlines already looked for any way to reduce the weight of their aircraft.
“It only makes sense that the weight of their passengers also impacts their costs,” she said.
One in eight U.S. adults said they were taking a GLP-1 in a November survey published by KFF, a nonprofit health research group.
Fuel is among airlines’ largest expenses. The Jefferies study estimates that the four airlines will together consume 16 billion gallons of fuel in 2026 at a total cost of $38.6 billion, nearly 20 percent of their total expenses.
One in eight U.S. adults said they were taking a weight-loss drug, according to one recent survey. (Credit: Jeffrey Greenberg/UCG, via Getty Images)
The savings from skinnier passengers would amount to just 1.5 percent of fuel costs. But airlines and pilots must scrutinize even the smallest changes to a plane’s weight and balance, and a lighter payload means each jet burns less fuel to generate the thrust necessary to fly.
Investors could also stand to benefit: The researchers estimated that a 2 percent reduction in aircraft weight could boost earnings per share by about 4 percent.
Ms. Kahyaoglu said she did not expect airlines to purchase less jet fuel as a result of the study’s findings. But she said weight-loss drugs might eventually lead to changes in how airlines generate additional revenue, especially if passengers start to buy fewer snacks.
Airlines including Air New Zealand, Finnair and Korean Air have in the past drawn criticism for weighing some passengers at the gate to help calculate weight and balance. That practice is somewhat more common on aircraft that seat just a few passengers, where a small change in weight distribution can affect how the plane flies.
But even for major airlines, efforts to cut weight and save money have sometimes veered into the extreme. Four decades ago, for example, American removed a single olive from each passenger’s salad, saving $40,000 per year in food and fuel costs.
“Airlines have a history of being vigilant around aircraft weight savings, from olives (pitless, of course) to paper stock,” the report says. “Passenger waist lines have thus far been out of their control.”
None of the four major airlines commented.
I’ve spent many nights considering how to charge passengers per kilo they (+ luggage) weigh. Unfortunately, this would incentivize more children on planes. So… nope.
I’m not really sure the solution. Cutting obesity rates from 40% to 35% definitely does not hurt.
