Precisely 14,000 More Libels + Reposts on Same Topic
Update: I wrote almost a week ago that once people dropped the “14,000 babies” blood libel, they would simply move on to the next legacy media approved blood libel. Sure enough, just two days after the 48-hour window passed, the exact same outlets that spread that first lie moved on to a new one: Gazan doctor’s 9 babies were killed.
Note: This tragic story has not been fully debunked yet. I do not want to act like a Palestine supporter and mock potentially inflated tragedies (see example below of Jacob Ringenwald and Marrisa Lee doing that). However, HonestReporting and others have pointed out that the images used to support the claim were not only AI-generated but have been circulating online since 2022. HonestReporting also noted that several photos shared by major media outlets claiming to depict Dr. Alaa al-Najjar were certainly not her. One image, published by Reuters, showed a woman in traditional Islamist clothing, clearly not someone practicing medicine. Additionally, many have observed that Dr. Alaa al-Najjar’s name cannot be found in any hospital staff directories or medical journals.
Examples of the October 7 and Holocaust skepticism by people who parrot blood libel:
Jacob Ringenwald (staff member at Rowan College of South Jersey) sarcastically writes in response to a Politlal Compass meme, “Music festival 40 babies human shields hostages. 9 hamasillion must die.” The music festival he’s sarcastically referencing is the Nova Massacre. 9 hamasillion is, for sure, a reference to a far right meme where they say “6 gorillian dead” or “6 gorillian must die.” I have seen this exact same verbiage “9 hamasillion” on far right pages praising Hitler. Jacob later feigned not knowing what he was referencing in his sarcasm, likely to imply that none of the events he listed happened. Jacob Ringenwald wrote, “Those were all things that 100% happened and weren't imagined or exaggerated by the media". [Here are videos of the Nova Massacre that Jacob Ringenwald and Marissa Lee seem to deny even happened.]
Hours later Marissa Lee of Oregon responded by defending Jacob’s rant as “bang on satire” and insisting Jews like me enjoy murder. Marissa Lee incorrect stated that the Holocaust encompasses more than Jewish death. While 10s of millions of non-Jewish people did die, the word Holocaust has a meaning, and I’ve written about this deliberate attempt to obscure this meaning. Marissa Lee shamelessly wrote, “there weren’t 40 beheaded Israeli babies… Jews aren’t the only people who were targetted and killed in the Holocaust but the death toll touted is 6 million lives lost and that was the fuckin event that led to Israel being a nation at all (.) now people who were subject to ethnic cleansing are engaging in the same behavior… you + Israel think its somehow acceptable… cause Jews are the perpetrators rather than the targets? & you lack basic functional literacy tbh. The comment you're replying to is a very basic and bang on example of SATIRE and your response to it and equating effectively written & intentional satire with being a Nazi, let alone a fuckin death cult, is truly insane behavior." The irony of Marissa Lee’s comment is lost on her.
Intro to Baby Blood Libel
On May 17, 2025, we were given the latest “blood libel for Palestine,” an apocalyptic claim that 14,000 babies would die in 48 hours in Gaza. Not 14. Fourteen thousand. Babies. In two days. The Jewish state was the primary or sole blame in each story.
This recent blood libel claim came from the UN’s humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, a man who publicly said nothing about the Nova Massacre, where unarmed festivalgoers were raped, kidnapped and murdered. Tom Fletcher, like many others in the UN, blames Israel for the war launched by Gaza on October 7, 2023, and sees no irony in this. He knows that Hamas could end the war at any point, preventing further bloodshed, by returning the hostages and disarming. He blames Israel instead.
It was not long before the claim was echoed by the usual suspects: state-sponsored channels including Al Jazeera, BBC, and NPR, and papers that seem to have a serious vendetta against Jewish existence like The Guardian and The New York Times. The UN and BBC would later retract their libel, insisting, "what we meant to say" is that there was one single report projecting approximately 14,100 cases of child malnutrition in Gaza between April 2025 and March 2026, based on bare minimum donations entering Gaza. Unlike in October 2023, when NPR and New York Times (but not The Guardian) vaguely released statements admitting they lied about the Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital, but did not apologize for it, these media outlets did not bother to retract their statements this time. As of today, a week later, the lie about 14,000 babies dying in 48 hours continues to circulate on social media, despite zero evidence. There also continues to be a complete lack of root cause analysis about why malnutrition happens in an area with major income inequality and high obesity rates.
i.e. A dubious paper was misquoted by a man to make an absurd claim that one second of critical thought would counter. It was echoed by people who continued to chant “only one solution: intifada revolution” and “resistance.” It’s just another oddly specific number used to demonize Israel by people, especially those in the U.S., U.K., and other Western states who need a scapegoat.
It’s a grotesque claim on its face, and one that collapses under the weight of even the lightest critical thinking. But the people sharing it aren’t interested in truth. They’re repeating a script older than the printing press—a script that once blamed Jews for poisoning wells, murdering children for ritual sacrifice, and now blames them for supernatural-scale infanticide by embargo.
This isn’t new. It’s just digital blood libel—now with hashtags.
The real tragedy here is not only the lie itself, but how it obscures the root cause of suffering in Gaza: a war that Palestine supporters openly do not want to end. Despite relentless cries of "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing," the slogans never change: Intifada. Resistance. By any means necessary. Even last week, the murder of two Jewish civilians at a museum was openly glorified by the same crowd that claims to mourn the innocent.
If their goal was peace, they would at least pretend to want disarmement on both sides. Instead, they want a myth to spread, a cause to chant, and a villain to blame.
Of note, one reporter in Gaza has claimed that 60,000 babies were born in Gaza since the war started. A group called Save the Children (who seem to exclude Jewish children from their mission) claims 130 babies are born daily in Gaza, and since the war has gone on 596 days, that would mean approximately 77,480 babies were born in Gaza during the war. More than a year ago, on March 28, 2024, NPR claimed “an estimated 20,000 children have been born in Gaza since [Gaza launched the war]." This echoed papers from January 2024 that also stated 20,000 babies were born. For comparison, in Auschwitz, where 1.7 million people were held over four years, it is estimated that 3,000 babies were delivered total—which is less than 1/20 the conservative estimates of Gaza. [I address these numbers again, later.]
Today, I’ll be covering blood libel, starting with some prominent cases. These are the sort of BS claims spread by Candace Owens, a major Palestine supporter,who has stated that Judaism is a "pedophile-centric religion that believes in demons... [and] child sacrifice..." Many politicians seem to agree with her.
After that, I’ll give a Substack repost. Then I’ll revisit the 109 libel I previously wrote about, because someone responded to that absurdly specific 109 number with, "Christians have been banned from 85 countries, none of which are Jewish, but you’re not ready for that conversation."
2. Short List of Baby Blood Libel
Originally this post was going to be solely focused on babies and children, filled with basic logic about how 15-18 year old (weapon yielding) Hamas members are far less innocent than people pretend. But the specificity of the number 14,000 (or 14,100) really irked me, reminding me of so many large numbers thrown around withour sources. Also, researching blood libel specific to babies and children is uber depressing. It turns out, so much of it has historically come from the British, without any evidence, just like today.
Yes, whether it is the 12th and 21st century, the English really love to point fingers at random Jews, precisely because they have a f-ing failing monarchy in 2025 and real colonies all over the world. Thomas Fletcher continues in that horrid tradition. Tom was born in Kent, went to Oxford (of course he did!) and despite being from Kent, acted as the “Northern Ireland adviser” to Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron, who never did anything wrong (/jk). His blood libel, echoed proudly by various BBC channels, is just a drop in the ocean of blood libel that Jew-obsessed fanatics have produced, but it gives you an idea of how utterly unoriginal and recycled these lies are.
I decided to cut this section short for my mental health. I already ranted about how frustrating Brit scapegoating is last week! So here is ChatGPT’s response after I asked for a quick list of examples of child specific blood libel:
William of Norwich (England, 1144): The earliest recorded blood libel case, where Jews in Norwich were accused of ritually murdering a boy named William.
Gloucester, England (1168): Following the pattern established in Norwich, Jews in Gloucester were similarly accused, fueling antisemitic sentiment.
Blois, France (1171): Over 30 Jews were burned at the stake after being accused of murdering a Christian child, despite no evidence.
Saragossa, Spain (1182): Jews were accused of ritual murder, showing how the myth had spread into the Iberian Peninsula.
Bristol, England (1183): Another English case reinforcing the blood libel myth.
Fulda, Germany (1235): After the unexplained deaths of several Christian children, Jews were accused and many were executed.
Munich, Germany (1286): Accusations here led to widespread persecution of the Jewish community.
Zurich Massacre (Switzerland, 1349): Amid the Black Death panic, Jews were accused of murdering a child and poisoning wells, leading to executions and expulsions.
Tiszaeszlár Affair (Hungary, 1882–1883): The disappearance of a Christian girl led to the arrest and trial of several Jews. Despite no evidence, antisemitic agitation intensified.
Hilsner Affair (Bohemia, 1899–1900): Leopold Hilsner, a Jewish man, was falsely accused of ritual murder and convicted amid mass hysteria.
Massena Blood Libel (New York, USA, 1928): An American instance where Jews were falsely accused of kidnapping and murdering a Christian girl. She was later found unharmed.
Kraków Pogrom (Poland, 1945): Rumors of Jews murdering children triggered violence, resulting in at least one death and numerous injuries.
Sadly, these lists are often viewed by antisemites not as refutations but as validation. It doesn’t matter to them that in many cases, the alleged victims were later found alive and well. For conspiracy theorists, absence of evidence is just more proof.
Next, I’ll repost Guerre and Shalom, which I’ve shared before, and his repost of “The Lantern and the Void.” You should follow both of them on Substack. They will briefly cover the story of Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln, the 14K lie, and recent events, before I return to some of the other conspiracies currently circulating.
Here is a link to Daniel’s Substack article: https://danielclarkeserret.substack.com/p/14000-starving-babies-return-of-the
Here is a link to Francisco’s Substack article: https://kfitzat.substack.com/p/to-the-editors-who-printed-the-lie
Repost: "14,000 Starving Babies”: Return of the Blood Libel
Daniel Clarke-Serret, Francisco J. Bernal; May 25, 2025
Lincolnshire is famous for three things: Isaac Newton, Margaret Thatcher and the most famous case of blood libel in history.
It was here that the death of “Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln” was falsely attributed to the Jews of England. They had killed Jesus once before and now the blood-suckers had returned to feast in a child’s blood. It was the lie that spread like wildfire due to the personal intervention of King Henry III; and the flame he lit has never been extinguished. In the infamous account of the chronicler Matthew Paris, the Jews of England were collectively liable for this “sacrifice”:
This year [1255] about the feast of the apostles Peter and Paul [27 July], the Jews of Lincoln stole a boy called Hugh, who was about eight years old. After shutting him up in a secret chamber, where they fed him on milk and other childish food, they sent to almost all the cities of England in which there were Jews, and summoned some of their sect from each city to be present at a sacrifice to take place at Lincoln, in contumely and insult of Jesus Christ. For, as they said, they had a boy concealed for the purpose of being crucified; so a great number of them assembled at Lincoln, and then they appointed a Jew of Lincoln judge, to take the place of Pilate, by whose sentence, and with the concurrence of all, the boy was subjected to various tortures. They scourged him till the blood flowed, they crowned him with thorns, mocked him, and spat upon him; each of them also pierced him with a knife, and they made him drink gall, and scoffed at him with blasphemous insults, and kept gnashing their teeth and calling him Jesus, the false prophet. And after tormenting him in diverse ways they crucified him, and pierced him to the heart with a spear. When the boy was dead, they took the body down from the cross, and for some reason disembowelled it; it is said for the purpose of their magic arts.
Hugh was henceforth viewed as a Christian martyr and sites associated with his life, above all Lincoln Cathedral, became objects of pilgrimage.
It took until 1955 for the Church of England to apologise - tokenistically and tardily - through placing a plaque at Hugh’s former shrine. It bore these words:
Trumped up stories of "ritual murders" of Christian boys by Jewish communities were common throughout Europe during the Middle Ages and even much later. These fictions cost many innocent Jews their lives. Lincoln had its own legend and the alleged victim was buried in the Cathedral in the year 1255.
Such stories do not redound to the credit of Christendom, and so we pray:
Lord, forgive what we have been,
amend what we are,
and direct what we shall be.
In the end, the Anglican apology was very short-lived, if it were ever sincere at all. Only yesterday, the bishops of an unrepetant institution stoked up the blood libel machine once more:
“We have watched with horror and outrage as siege and starvation are used as a weapon of war in Gaza, and as hospitals and health facilities have been systemically targeted. Over the last three months, the Israeli government’s deliberate denial of food and medical aid to an entire civilian population is an atrocity that defies our common humanity. It is the very definition of collective punishment and has no moral justification….We note that the Israeli Government has been challenged before the International Court of Justice. Starving children cannot wait for legal rulings given that every country has an obligation to prevent crimes against humanity.”
But if the Church of England have returned to their natural state of blaming the Jew first, apologising centuries later, the United Nations did one better. They made a complete lie go viral. Their latest antisemitic representative Tom Fletcher informed the world that:
14,000 babies in Gaza could die from malnutrition within 48 hours.
Guess what: It wasn’t true. Over 48 hours have passed and those 14,000 babies are still alive (thankfully, but inevitably). Yet in true Henry III form, Keir Starmer, Mark Carney and Emmanuel Macron have given the libel their seal of approval.
It’s the lie as old as time:
Jews sacrifice babies.
Given the return to medieval antisemitism, it is only appropriate that we invite expert media analyst - and beautiful prose-poet - Francisco J Bernal to give his reaction. He hails from Seville, the land of genocide liar Pedro Sánchez, but he currently lives in the rural idyll of …you guessed it…LINCOLNSHIRE!
This is but the appetiser, for later this “anti-Israel bias week” Francisco will be back. In his soon to be published in-depth analysis of a France 24 report, he will demonstrate how our biased media subtly - and not so subtly - tilts the scales against the Jewish State.
Francisco’s Substack The Lantern and the Void is a must read. Do subscribe.
In the meantime, sit back and rage against the lie machine; the lie machine which has beset the Jews since their were accused of the original Jesus-sacrificing blood libel 2000 years ago. Then it was the Catholic Church. After it was the Anglican Communion. Now it’s the United Nations and their media acolytes.
Each and every time, the Jews are accused of child murder, provoking in turn the real murder of Jews. It happened once again this week in Washington DC. It was the tragedy that was waiting to happen. Just when are they going to learn?
“To the editors who printed the lie of 14,000 starving babies”
Francisco J Bernal; May 24, 2025
You knew it wasn’t true. You printed it anyway.
Fourteen thousand Gaza infants, starving to death within 48 hours. No source. No context. No verification. Just a number pulled from the fog and handed to the BBC by a UN official who later admitted it was a projection over twelve months, not a death count. A maybe. A model. A myth.
But you didn’t wait. You ran it as fact. You sold it as urgency. You turned it into banners, push alerts, Instagram tiles. A famine that didn’t happen, shouted from every screen.
You didn’t stumble. You didn’t miss a nuance. You made a choice. To believe a terror regime. To dress up propaganda as compassion. To make Hamas sound like UNICEF.
You did this because it felt good. Because it made Israel into the monster you needed it to be. Because rage gets clicks and facts get buried.
You ignored the correction. You buried the clarification. You never explained that the number was fantasy. You just moved on, like hit-and-run drivers.
You turned lies into currency. And you spent it freely.
This isn’t journalism. This is betrayal. Of your readers. Of the truth. Of the dead.
On October 7, Hamas stormed the border. They slaughtered 1,200 people. They burned families alive. They raped women beside their children. They took babies. They dragged the elderly into tunnels. They filmed it.
And you’ve spent the months since trying to tell the world that Israel is the problem. That the country trying to rescue hostages from beneath schools and hospitals is the aggressor. That the death cult hiding behind its own children is somehow the victim.
You fell for Hamas’s lies again and again. Or worse. You didn’t fall. You leapt.
You ran images from Syria. From Iraq. From staged photo shoots in Saudi Arabia. You showed empty pots and claimed famine. You shared graves and called it mourning. You cropped markets and called them ghost towns. Each time the lie spread, you watched. And said nothing.
You didn’t get it wrong. You made it wrong.
You became the mouthpiece of men who celebrate the murder of Jews. You quoted them like scholars. You platformed them like saints.
You wouldn’t print casualty figures from ISIS. But Hamas? You run their numbers on page one.
Why not quote someone who knows the region? Who speaks Arabic or Hebrew?
Why not Khaled Abu Toameh, an Israeli Arab journalist who’s reported from the ground for decades?
Why not Yossi Klein Halevi, Einat Wilf, or Lyn Julius? Because they wouldn’t give you what you want.
Because Khaled writes for an Israeli outlet. And that, for you, is disqualifying. Truth be damned.
They would tell you that Hamas is not a liberation movement. That it is an extermination project. That its charter is not a policy document. It is a call to genocide.
And that doesn’t make for good optics.
You’ve poisoned the public. You’ve abandoned the truth. You’ve made it harder for people to tell fact from fiction. You’ve made it easier for hatred to spread.
So here it is. Retract it. Not just the headline. The instinct.
Admit what you did. Admit you ran with a number because it suited the mood. Admit you cared more about outrage than accuracy. Admit you printed a blood libel in real time.
And if you can’t do that, then don’t call yourself a journalist. Call yourself what you are.
A narrator for the mob. A salesman for the lie. A mask for the oldest hatred on earth.
More Specific Numbers
OK, I’ve said this three times already, but it’s worth repeating 100 more times: Truth does not matter to martyr loving Palestine Supporters, especially those who said “14,000 babies will die in 48 hours.” They knew it was a lie when they said it. None of them apologized after 48 hours. They blocked people who called them out and moved on to the next lie. And then they’ll move on to the next. Truth is not the goal.
So I want to revisit the 109 claim I previously wrote about. It’s a Nazi-originated lie (yes, it comes straight from Nazi websites) that Jews were kicked out of exactly 109 countries. Why 109? Same reason as 14,000: Specificity makes the lie seem credible. Numbers turn to dog whistles—a favorite tactic among bigots who try to mask their hate with subtlety.
In my original essay on the 109 libel, I compared the Jewish expulsion claims to saying that Africans were enslaved in X number of countries, and therefore the countries enslaving them were justified. I still stand by that analogy. But someone on Facebook offered a much simpler counter: ‘Christians were kicked out of 85 countries.’
I love this response. Not because it’s perfectly accurate, but because 85 is such a wonderfully specific number too, similarly rooted in overblown generalizations. Christians, like Jews, were expelled from states. That’s evidence of persecution, not proof of evil.
Imagine if every time some Nazi loser said “109,” someone shot back “85.” Sure, it’s one exaggeration countering another, but sometimes fire fights fire. We need the opposite of a dog whistle here: numbers, words or hashtags that evoke just how stupid extremists are. Maybe it would provoke them to ask, “Where did you get 85 from?” That question alone disrupts the spell.
Palestine supporters have plunged so deep into the “everything is a false flag” mentality that sometimes it takes a wild counter-narrative to even get their attention. It’s like the internet joke of replying to moon landing deniers with, “Oh, you still believe in the moon?” (I swore this was XKCD but can’t find it. Closest vibe: https://xkcd.com/258/ and https://xkcd.com/1074/.)
So, just as a reminder, here are some verified cases where Christians were explicitly banned from living in or practicing openly within a state:
Japan (17th–19th centuries): Under the Tokugawa shogunate, Christianity was banned. Foreign missionaries were expelled, and Japanese Christians were forced to renounce their faith or face execution.
Roman Empire (1st–4th centuries): Early Christians faced waves of persecution for refusing to worship Roman gods.
Sasanian Empire (3rd–7th centuries): Christians were persecuted as they were seen as aligned with the rival Roman Empire.
Ottoman Empire (1915–1923): During the Armenian Genocide, Assyrian and Greek Orthodox Christians were also targeted for mass killings and expulsions.
Soviet Union (20th century): State atheism led to church closures, arrests of clergy, and suppression of Christian practices.
Do we count the Soviet Union (15 states) and Ottoman Empire (20–30 eyalets) as one state each or dozens? It doesn’t matter. We are now countering 109 with 85. These numbers are as useful as points on "Whose Line Is It Anyway?"
In the present day, Christian activity is banned or heavily restricted in North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, Iran, Eritrea, Brunei, Maldives. Take a guess which side all of these states, minus the Saudi gov, are on.
Has anyone ever pointed to Afghan or Somalia and said: “Look, they expelled Christians. That proves Christians are evil.” Of course not. That would be insane. The only thing crazier would be believing Israel is solely responsible for exactly 14,000 babies dying over 48 hours. Naturally, all the states I listed are likely to be amplifying that conspiracy to downplay their very real human rights abuses.
Even MORE Specific Numbers
Lets dig into some additional specific numbers to counter and contextualize the "14,000 babies" blood libel. Here are several of the most widely accepted genocides in recent history:
Khmer Rouge Genocide (Cambodia, 1975–1979): 1.5 to 3 million killed.
Armenian Genocide (1915): 1.5 million Armenians exterminated.
Rwandan Genocide (1994): 500,000 to 1,000,000 killed in just 100 days.
Bangladesh Genocide (1971): Up to 3 million killed, 200,000–400,000 women raped.
East Timor Genocide (1975–1999): Between 90,800 and 202,600 deaths.
Guatemalan Genocide (1962–1996): Estimated 200,000 killed.
Bosnian Genocide (1995): Around 8,000 men and boys murdered in Srebrenica alone; thousands more killed in executions across farms, schools, and fields.
Is this a complete list? No. But it illustrates that real genocide typically targets unarmed populations, not a belligerent regime actively launching rockets.It also gives scale. In the Shoa, 2/3 of European Jews died.
What is left out from the list is also valuable. More Germans and Japanese died in WWII than Americans. No one claims German Nationals were genocide victims. Some are starting to claim it over Japan, but they are met with serious skepticism and anger over missing context.
Next, let’s talk about displacement numbers. Recent evacuations in Middle Eastern conflicts dwarf anything we’ve seen from Gaza. The very same people insisting 14,000 babies will die also insist they should stay put in Gaza despite:
780,000 left Lebanon when Hezbollah joined the war—including 326,000 in two weeks.
276,000 left Syria, with many more still fleeing.
60,000 Israelis left their homes, prompting doomsayers to claim Israel was "collapsing."
That is to say more than a million were displaced in this war, ignoring Gaza all together.
For more context, according to UNHCR, Ukraine has:
3.7 million internally displaced
6.9 million seeking refuge abroad
12.7 million needing urgent humanitarian assistance
And yet, nobody demanded that Russia feed Ukrainians. Nobody told Ukrainians to stay put in bombed-out towns. Nobody said Ukraine is a “failed project” after people fled. But for Gaza, Palestine supporters insist civilians must stay, even malnourished babies, who seem to rarely get photographed. Apparently, human shields are a sacred requirement in one area affected by war.
As Lee Kern put it:
“Nearly SEVEN million Ukrainians left Ukraine to find refuge whilst a war took place. The fact that civilians in Gaza—FAR SMALLER in number—were not allowed to seek refuge in other countries (including Egypt, which shares a border) is a crime. Israel has to fight Hamas because Hamas started a war, kidnapped Israelis, and plans to exterminate Jews. Civilians in Gaza have been DELIBERATELY kept as human shields not just by Hamas, but by other countries who wouldn’t let women and children leave. The moral posturing of Britain, France, Canada, and Arab states is a disgrace. They have blood on their hands.”
To top this off, we continue to see Palestine Supporters laugh about exagerated claims of beheaded babies on October 7. Since only a few babies were beheaded on Oct 7, not dozens, it prompts the sick fucks behind Palestine Martyr Support to giggle. You know, Hamas members only filmed themselves putting one baby in an oven, cutting one baby out of a womb (before murdering the baby and mom).
I am yet to see a single Israel supporter laugh about this 14,000 number, because it’s not a laughing matter. For Israel supporters, one baby starving is serious. Our haters had to amplify their rhetoric because they’re continuing to lose the war they started and perpetuate. But Israelis can’t laugh, because we know there are real famines around the world, and there are certainly major issues with food distribution in Gaza. Even the most far right, Ben Gvir loving Israelis have empathy for the starving babies of Gaza. They just blame deliberate abuse from groups profitting on war, not the coutnries sending the aid.
And if I want to be callous, let’s compare mortality of babies in Gaza to the Shoa. Save the Children estimates 130 babies are born daily in Gaza (* 596 days of war) or 77,480 babies born during the war. That’s about 25 times more than the estimated number of babies born across all of WWII’s concentration camps. So not only did 14K babies not die, somewhere between 50,000 and 100,000 babies were born in Gaza during the war (see section 1). Gaza is hell, but it is also a dream for real concentration camp victims.
Blood libel is a vehicle to erase causality and assign scapegoats. Expect more oddly specific numbers to come out. They’re going to start handing them out like lucky numbers in a fortune cookie.
Exchange on LinkedIn where Daniel Dumitru Danila (a random man in Sweden) tells a man from Gaza, who lost 33 members in war, that he is an evil Zionist. Ahmed Alkhatib regularly speaks about malnutrition in Gaza but did not support the “14,000 babies” blood libel.
Asking Questions For Those Who Can’t
As a closing thought, let me be clear: conspiracy theorists are not "just asking questions." They are Jew-obsessed freaks who reject experts and glorify some of the most hateful people on Earth. They give conclusions, not ask questions.
These people could, if they cared about truth, research historical secret societies like P2, Gladio, the Thule Society, The Order, or the Bohemian Club. They would find that none of these groups are remotely Jewish. In fact, many of them targeted Jews.
But conspiracy theorists aren’t after difficult truths. They want convenient lies. The conspiracies surrounding Palestine are not nuanced, hard-to-prove revelations. They are lazy, easily falsifiable lies that are deliberately designed to be easy to remember and emotionally inflammatory. They are accompanied by the placard statements, ‘Zionism is {one bad thing} and {another bad thing}.’
I wish I could believe that someone who parrots lies is deeply caring about Gaza. But I just can’t believe that, especially as these lies are never accompanied by calls for Gaza to surrender. Instead, the people who echo lies hate “Realign for Palestine” and any Arab who goes against their scapegoat narrative. The goal isn’t peace. It’s scapegoating. It’s rage. It’s antisemitism dressed up in the language of humanitarianism.
The people who spread these narratives are not confused. They are not misinformed. They are committed to a fantasy in which Jews are always guilty, always powerful, and always to blame. That is what makes these lies so persistent.
Truth is complex. These people aren’t looking for complexity. They want stories that fit their worldview. That’s why the lies keep getting more specific. More absurd. More deadly.
The conspiracies for Palestine aren’t about justice. They’re about never having to admit that the suffering in Gaza has a cause—and that it isn’t Israel.
Comment below: Do you prefer a clean lie or a complicated truth?
